Yellow Journalism and the Whims of Our Preferred Search Engines May Lead Us Astray in Our Quest For Health

Yellow journalism is a type of journalism that uses sensationalism and exaggeration to catch the attention and sway the beliefs of readers. It is poorly researched and often presents only one perspective of the story. Sometimes, it may even have misleading graphs and exaggerated illustrations. Although it is not always false, it often tends to be overly dramatic and manipulative, playing on our emotions, our desire to belong to the majority or our fears. When the articles corroborate prevailing popular ideas, they are even easier to believe. My recent research into vitamin C led me to an article by Atli Arnarson, Ph.D. in Healthline.com, entitled 10 Nutrients That You Can't Get From Animal Foods, " which I consider yellow journalism. It implies that meat is bad and vegetables are good for you, both popular notions already, so the information it contains makes it much easier to believe. Furthermore, search engines skew their results, further exacerbating our quest for information. I will critique the article and also cover the shortcomings of internet searches of health-related subjects in this post.